Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
In 1927, the year that Heisenberg announced his "uncertainty principle," Niels Bohr also described the "principle of complementarity" for quantum systems: for every measurable quantity there exists a "complementary" measurable quantity.
This is based on the interpretation that, for example, a steep downward curve means that a small increase in the quantity on the horizontal axis implies a large decrease of the complementary quantity on the vertical axis.
This paper presents a new method to assess these three complementary quantities with a single experiment.
This second argument focuses clearly on the interpretation of quantum state functions in terms of "real states" of a system, and not on any issues about simultaneous values (real or not) for complementary quantities.
Information about spatial temperature variations is obtained indirectly by observing two complementary quantities that sensitively reflect the local temperature.
In addition to complementary descriptions Bohr also talks about complementary phenomena and complementary quantities.
Unlike EPR, none of Einstein's arguments makes use of simultaneous values for complementary quantities like position and momentum.
Position and momentum, as well as time and energy, are complementary quantities.[5] We have seen that Bohr's approach to quantum theory puts heavy emphasis on the language used to communicate experimental observations, which, in his opinion, must always remain classical.
We measure two complementary quantities to show both sensitivity and specificity, for both the raw outcomes and HC outcomes.
In epidemiology, performances are discussed either by reporting these error rates or their complementary quantities that measure the success rates of the decision rule.
All primers demonstrated approximately equally efficiency, with standard curve slopes of approximately 1, indicating a doubling in complementary DNA quantity in each cycle [ 39].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com