The phrase "a complementary explanation for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to provide an additional or supportive explanation for a particular concept or idea.
Example: "The researcher provided a complementary explanation for the observed phenomena, enhancing our understanding of the subject."
Alternatives: "an additional explanation for" or "a supportive explanation for".
Moreover, the physical effects of a species on its environment might be a complementary explanation for rapid radiation events in species through the creation of new habitat types.
This is also a complementary explanation for the impact of experience, as more information about the market, business networks and business skills will be acquired during that period.
A complementary explanation for the correlation of migraine with seizure frequency would be a different genetic background in patients with migraine and JME than in patients with JME alone, meaning that it is more difficult to treat epilepsy in patients with additional migraine.
A complementary explanation for the prevalence of Astomonema in deeper sediment layers could be that in deeper layers they would be better protected against possible predators.
Using this strategy, we have previously shown that a variety of brightness illusions represent a robust response to the statistical relationship between images and scenes, independent of specific features of the visual system itself [15] (see also ref. [17] for a complementary explanation for illusions of space).
A complementary explanation for the loss of prediction accuracy among unrelated individuals could be that markers were largely capturing existing relationships between CV training and testing sets [ 15, 16].
A complementary explanation of the differences across gender is the changes in the production model of the economy.
The symptoms were approved with two changes, one was a complementary explanation recommended for the symptom cold sweat to avoid misinterpretation.
A complementary explanation has been offered for the relation of increased error signals to the severity of obsessions and compulsions in OCD (Gehring et al., 2000; Ursu et al., 2003).
We agree that the biased HGT hypothesis of Gogarten, Doolittle and Lawrence is a viable alternative although there seems to be considerable uncertainty as to whether biased HGT could be the sole explanation for the observed tree-like patterns for gene ensembles, or just a complementary explanation to a genuine trend of vertical evolution [ 32, 119].
