The phrase "a compelling justification of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasoning or rationale behind a particular argument, decision, or action.
Example: "The report provided a compelling justification of the need for increased funding in education."
Alternatives: "a strong rationale for" or "a persuasive argument for".
Whether under the somewhat tarnished banner of substantive due process or under a different rubric, the designation of a right as fundamental requires that the state offer a compelling justification for limitations of that right.
These results provide a compelling justification for the use of full text as opposed to only abstracts and titles in TM.
The letter goes on to state that "the public has a substantial and legitimate interest in this decision," accusing MoMA of withholding a "compelling justification for the cultural and environmental waste of destroying this much-admired, highly distinctive" building.
This study represents an important advance toward predictive understanding of biology-environment interactions, and a compelling justification for coordinating environmental/geochemical measurements in –omics-enabled studies of natural environments.
"The public has a substantial and legitimate interest in this decision, and the Museum of Modern Art has not yet offered a compelling justification for the cultural and environmental waste of destroying this much-admired, highly distinctive twelve-year-old building".
"The public has a substantial and legitimate interest in this decision, and the Museum of Modern Art has not yet offered a compelling justification for the cultural and environmental waste of destroying this much-admired, highly distinctive 12-year-old building".
As president of the University of Michigan, Bollinger led the school's historic litigation in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, Supreme Court decisions that upheld and clarified the importance of diversity as a compelling justification for affirmative action in higher education.
A prominent advocate of affirmative action, he played a leading role in the twin Supreme Court cases Grutter v Bollinger and Gratz v Bollinger that upheld and clarified the importance of diversity as a compelling justification for affirmative action in higher education.
