The phrase "a comparison table with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a table that presents comparisons between different items, features, or data points.
Example: "In the report, we included a comparison table with the features of each product to help consumers make informed decisions."
Alternatives: "a comparison chart featuring" or "a comparison table containing".
Table 4 is a comparison table of the MUCON protocol with other data protection schemes [12].
For a clear view on the improvements of BS-Seeker2, a comparison table on the supported features is presented (Table 4) in comparison with other BS aligners.
A comparison table (union_rfs_ens_comparison.tab[ 44]), was produced with a custom Perl[ 45] script from VCF files containing ANNOVAR annotations when using REFSEQ and ENSEMBL transcripts and gene information for the transcript(s) used for each annotation.
Comparison tables with six columns, one for theme code, one for theme description, and one each for the four focus groups, were created and notations were made whenever one or more speakers in each focus group voiced a specific theme.
Table S2 detailed the updated tests; a comparison with Table S2 from Krsticevic et al. 2010 shows that the estimated parameters are similar.
For a comparison with Table 2, elasticities of LE 60 evaluated at the means are provided in the column entitled Table 2. Three things are noteworthy.
A comparison with Table 1 reveals that almost two million people were lost during transportation.
Qualitatively the results are largely in agreement, although a comparison with Table 1 in the original study does highlight some differences; for example, RDK5 performs worse in our analysis, and the order of LAvalon and Avalon is reversed.
A comparison with Table 1 depicts that all nine toxin metabolites detected in the HT2-treated samples were also detected in the T2-treated samples, due to fast conversion of T2 into HT2 in planta.
Also, a comparison of this table with Table 2 shows that the tools under consideration do not yield very different sensitivities when the rate of mutations increases.
A comparison of Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 with Tables S1 and S2 indicates that a number of currently used pesticides (e.g. alachlor, dimethoate) were not found in any samples, and that some of the most environmentally persistent pesticides banned from use in the last 10 years (e.g. aldrin, endrin) also do not appear.
