The phrase "a comparison strategy" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing methods or approaches that involve comparing different elements, such as data, products, or ideas.
Example: "In our analysis, we employed a comparison strategy to evaluate the effectiveness of the two marketing campaigns."
Alternatives: "a comparative approach" or "a benchmarking method".
When comparing the performance of different compression methods, it is difficult to devise a comparison strategy between different compression methods that allows easy predictions since lossy compression performance and accuracy are in general highly data dependent.
A comparison strategy for cases with a large number of questioned samples was devised, involving identification of critical fibres in the casework data set, development of preliminary fibre groups classified according to their corresponding/similar MSP spectra, and verification of the preliminary groups via brightfield and fluorescence comparison microscopy.
Since there is no chance of performing a cross-validation analysis with motif matching, we choose self-consistency as a comparison strategy.
Through establishment of a systematic comparison strategy, performance comparison with a laboratory scale tubular Fixed-Bed Reactor (FBR) with three different dilution ratios was made to evaluate the IMPBRHE.
As a performance metric we used the number of enriched GO terms, a common comparison strategy [ 11, 47].
As a point of comparison, Strategy Analytics gave Apple an even bigger margin of the market for the last quarter.
We conducted a pilot study to demonstrate the effectiveness of a cross-species comparison strategy to distinguish between cancer driver and passenger alteration candidates, by utilizing the difference in the genomic location of orthologous genes and genomic loci between the human and other mammals.
Guidelines for a relevant model comparison strategy are finally proposed.
(As a point of comparison, Strategy Analytics, which ranks by platform not vendor, gave Apple essentially the same marketshare last week).
Then, a global compactness comparison strategy is proposed, taking into account design constraints.
What results is a more purposive comparison strategy in place of the somewhat arbitrary criterion of statistical significance, which plays virtually no role in AIC models.
