The phrase "a comparison of users" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the analysis or evaluation of different users, often in the context of research, surveys, or data analysis.
Example: "The study included a comparison of users based on their engagement levels with the application."
Alternatives: "an analysis of users" or "a contrast of users".
To this end, the discussion of the results is divided into six subsections: facilitators, barriers, a comparison of users and nonusers, sample comments, limitations, and contextualized solutions to address the adoption issues.
In a comparison of users of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors with users of conventional non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the latter group was reported to have higher knee cartilage volume loss [ 30].
Furthermore, a comparison of user models and generated action protocols is facilitated.
In the behavior similarity calculation, many features are taken into account including a comparison of user profile images, various textual attributes from the users' profiles, and a rudimentary modeling of writing style (based on extraction of the most unique words of each user).
In July 2010, Graham et al 7 published a paper in JAMA, based on data from the US Medicare beneficiaries, showing increased risks of several cardiovascular events, as well as all-cause mortality, in a comparison of rosiglitazone users with pioglitazone users.
A comparison of ST users with non-users of tobacco will therefore be biased by smokers being included only in the group using ST.
We were able to compare data across studies by restricting our analysis to a comparison of current users at baseline or reference date and current non-users at baseline or reference date.
For example, the percentage of elderly people and children using the devices and apps that generate mobile data is relatively low, so the data do not reflect China's real age structure (a comparison of the users' ages and location distributions versus the survey results is shown in Supplementary Figure S8).
A comparison of COTC users who had experienced adverse events and those who had not is shown in Table 3.
To our knowledge, earlier Nepalese studies are limited to the exploration of social and demographic factors associated with tobacco use among in-school adolescents and a comparison of tobacco users versus nonusers (24, 25, 29).
This descriptive study of rural Tibetan women in Qinghai Province provides a comparison of early users of the TBTC and peers from their communities, as well as a test of hypotheses predicting characteristics of the early users of this newly-constructed birth center.
