The phrase "a comparison of the number of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing the differences or similarities between quantities in various contexts, such as research, reports, or presentations.
Example: "The study presents a comparison of the number of participants in each group to determine the effectiveness of the treatment."
Alternatives: "an analysis of the quantity of" or "a contrast of the amounts of".
A comparison of the number of people being thrown out of work in this recession with that of the severe recession of 1981-82 windicatecate why.
Moreover, a comparison of the number of fluorescent cells 48 and 120 h after transfection for all these FPs confirmed the high miRFP670nano cellular stability (Supplementary Fig. 6).
THE 2004 CAMPAIGN: ON TELEVISION -- THE TV WATCH Correction: October 12, 2004, Tuesday A TV Watch column in some late editions on Saturday about the televised debate between President Bush and Senator John Kerry misstated a comparison of the number of times the two candidates addressed questioners in the audience by name.
specifically with respect to allosensitized patients, a comparison of the number of heart transplants performed, the mortality rate for individuals on the heart transplant waiting lists, and the post heart transplant survival rate nationally and by region prior to and after the heart allocation policy change of 2006.
Table 6 presents a comparison of the number of airbags.
The K-index is a comparison of the number of Twitter followers with citations.
A comparison of the number of headache days during the baseline period and 1 month post-treatment was not significant.
Figure 3 shows a comparison of the number of samples measured both with F-ISE and titration.
Like-for-like sales (actually a marker of revenue flowing through the cash tills rather than a comparison of the number of items sold) are down 2.8%.
A comparison of the number of earthquakes and vertical movement in Fig. 2a shows that the number of earthquakes is also relatively large during intermittent uplifts.
A comparison of the number of sources used by Ita et al. (2008), and in this paper, is presented in Table 1.
