The necessary inclusion of a comparison category decreases the resemblance between the syllogisms' conclusions and the dysfunctional beliefs, thereby probably decreasing the sensitivity of the task.
If this interpretation is correct, it would suggest that the Commission wanted to create a comparison of categories of information.
An open question is whether the BDD and control groups indeed implicitly evaluate attractiveness comparably, or whether methodological factors (e.g., the IAT design requirement of a relative comparison category for attractiveness) made it difficult to observe group differences.
Table 3a-wrap> gives a comparison, by category, of spot measurements made in the same position separated by 48 h and Table 3b-wrap> shows the correlations between these repeated spot measurements.
Then using a process of constant comparison, categories from all of the data sets were compared for the purpose of identifying the predominant themes.
We calculated mean birth weight and the percentages of SGA, preterm births and a comparison group by categories of socio-demographic variables (table 1).
For categorical variables, we reported the p-value for the test for a significant difference in the dependent variable between the category of interest and the comparison category, where the comparison category is the category with parameter estimate of zero.
Enrichment of multiple-level GO functional categories was determined using the GOSSIP/Fisher Exact test package [74], through a comparison of the categories found in our list of genes compared to the list of all genes found on the goldfish cDNA microarray.
However, a comparison of stimulus category preferences across mediotemporal regions showed that objects are underrepresented in the hippocampus compared to EC40.
The results of each comparison category are shown in Table 2, Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 4A shows a comparison of the functional categories of the genes showing >2-fold regulation; these are individually listed (along with their fold-changes in mRNA expression and q-values) in Additional file 4. Table 3 itemizes those genes upregulated in cBF that have predicted functions (excluding VSGs and ESAGS, which are discussed below).
