For lung and colorectal cancer, case-mix had a comparatively small effect on the excess mortality rate ratio for EP compared with non-EP in the first month after diagnosis.
Seed germinated from the seed bank in sediments collected from different ponds showed relatively small differences in richness or community composition in mesocosms, suggesting a comparatively small effect of dispersal limitation on species richness.
The introduction of a temporal jitter to compound EPSCs had a comparatively small effect on STP, with a tenfold increase in jitter resulting in only a five fold decrease in STP.
Although age was included in the model it had a comparatively small effect: every one year increase in age increased the effect of continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose by 0.002% HbA1c (0.02 mmol/mol).
However, our data indicate that the role of Abcc transporters in efflux of rhodamine B is minor: MK571, an inhibitor of mammalian ABCCs, has a comparatively small effect on rhodamine B efflux.
Strikingly, priming with IFN-γ enabled 3-IB-PP1 treatment to stimulate robust downstream signaling through Erk as well as Akt, the MAPK JNK, and the calcium-sensitive transcription factor NFAT. Priming with IFN-γ had a comparatively small effect on downstream signaling in response to zymosandep.
This is in accordance with other research findings indicating that a positive family history of breast cancer is a strong risk factor for breast cancer at young age [ 3], although this has a comparatively small effect on the absolute lifetime incidence of and mortality from breast cancer [ 4].
This view of the data provided a clear focus on two genomic regions, the FGFR2 region of chromosome 10 q, which has a very strong main effect along with suggestive evidence for interaction, and the MRPS30 region of chromosome 5 p, which shows evidence of a comparatively smaller main effect and suggestive evidence for interaction.
Both the acoustic impedance deviations of the cement sheath and the formation impose comparatively smaller effects on the inversion results, with maximum relative errors of 0.29 and 0.15%, respectively.
Other stimulus related factors, such as eccentricity or luminance level, have a significant but comparatively small effect on reaction time within the central 30°-radius visual field in healthy young individuals.
Consequently, our results did not support a model, which posits comparatively small effect trade-offs in natural populations.
