Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Open image in new window Fig. 3 Plot showing a comparative removal of fluoride.
Similar(56)
Comparative removal of two cationic dyes, Basic Green 4 (BG4) and Basic Yellow 28 (by28), by chemically modified nanoclay was optimized using the central composite design.
The comparative removal of minor and trace elements in GB-1 and GB-2 coal samples of Gopinathpur bottom seam after 28 days of bacterial treatment using 10 mg/mL of biomass is shown in Fig. 5.
The comparative removal of these elements in GT-1 coal sample of Gopinathpur top seam after 28 days of treatment using 10 and 25 mg/mL of bacterial biomass is shown in Fig. 6.
A comparative study of removal of dye on all the four adsorbents is studied by considering various parameters like adsorbent dose, concentration of dye, pH of the solution and time.
Table 3 gives a comparative study of fluoride removal by processes other than bioremediation.
This study presents a comparative evaluation of soot removal and fingerprint enhancement techniques, following fire(s) to ascertain optimal process efficacy for recovering fingerprints.
Mubarak et al. (2016) made a comparative study of the removal of Pb2+ ions and Cr3+ ions to determine the efficiency of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) produced using microwave heating as an adsorbent in removing heavy metal ions from waste water.
In the present study, we report a comparative study of Reactive Blue 235 (RB235) dye removal using red mud derived biologically synthesized iron nanoparticles (bRMINP) and chemically synthesized iron nanoparticles (cRMINP), both immobilized in barium alginate beads.
In a comparative analysis of RNA-Seq datasets, DEGs detected in contigs that underwent redundancy removal via the homology search method showed the highest identity to the DEGs detected when the TAIR10 gene dataset was used as an exact reference.
Table 6 lists a comparative study of adsorption capacities for the prepared AC with those in the literature for removal of heavy metals from water and wastewater.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com