The phrase "a common set of reference" is not correct in English.
It should be "a common set of references." You can use it when discussing shared standards or sources of information among a group.
Example: "In our discussions, we need to establish a common set of references to ensure everyone is on the same page."
Alternatives: "a shared set of references" or "a unified set of references."
A method to conform the results of different type of comparisons to a common set of Reference Values of a CIPM Key Comparison, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA), is the subject of this paper.
One possible explanation for the similarity between the UK and Melbourne estimates, in instances in which there are comparable data, is that both groups may be basing their answers on a common set of reference data, such as clinical trial results or other published data.
In reality, sketches are just one of the things that are shared in order to create a common set of references to support the design activity.
A common set of four reference strains were included on each gel to maintain consistency of scoring across gels.
While these have delivered their immediate aims, the lack of a comprehensive common set of reference markers has limited the number of opportunities to align these maps and, so, the associated trait data produced for different studies.
JXTA has a common set of open protocols backed with open source reference implementations for developing peer-to-peer applications.
At the simplest level, two databases can be related to each other when they both reference a common set of biological variables.
While strains A1 and A2 exhibited less than 200 nonsense and missense mutation differences, they carried a common set of 361 SNVs relative to the WS34/70 reference sequence.
The main achievements of the working group are (i) the development of a freely available Web server for orthology benchmarking and (ii) a comparison of eight orthology databases on a common set of 66 species (2011 Quest for Orthologs reference proteome dataset) on a battery of 10 phylogenetic and functional tests.
Several standards are required to produce the functional and semantic interoperability necessary to support the exchange of such data: a common reference information model, a common set of data elements, a common terminology, common data structures, and a common transport standard.
As an alternative evaluation approach for unlabeled trees, we quantified 'correctness' in terms of the agreement between the topologies of plain trees and reference trees (pruned to a common set of leaves) in terms of the Robinson Foulds distance [ 32].
