The phrase "a common set of methods" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a group of techniques or approaches that are widely accepted or utilized in a particular field or context.
Example: "In our research, we employed a common set of methods to ensure consistency and reliability in our results."
Alternatives: "a standard collection of techniques" or "a shared group of approaches."
In order to systematically document and interpret the material remains of past societies, archaeologists have developed a common set of methods and procedures.
In three papers published in this issue (Lee et al. 2017; Martinez et al. 2017), the authors applied a common set of methods to locate research showing the distribution of crime among places, offenders, and victims published since the 1970s (and before in the case for offenders).
We suggest caution in interpreting this result at this time, but this is certainly a pattern that demands further investigation using a common set of methods and a large taxonomic sample.
The NADPH enzymes have previously been included in studies of stressors in a variety of organisms (Goodridge 1968; Kim and Park 1995; Marron et al. 2003; Singh et al. 2007), but our study allowed us to quantify interactions using a common set of methods and a uniform set of genetic backgrounds specific to this study (G6pdEx40/i, IdhEx4/i, MenEx3/i).
Pincus and Naber [ 52] presented elements of a quality strategy for mental healthcare which included a common set of quality measures, methods to collect and report on core data, and validated assessment instruments (p. 609).
In order to facilitate comparison across labs as well as platforms, we selected a number of genes which are reliably annotated and targeted by a common set of probesets (see Methods).
Laurel Beckett, Danielle Harvey, and colleagues affiliated with the ADNI biostatistics core are finishing an analysis that emphasizes the need to compare markers on a common set of subjects and demonstrates a method not only for characterizing biomarkers but also for statistically testing for differences between measures.
For paired comparison experiments involving options described by a common set of two-level factors a new method for generating exact designs is presented.
As seen in Table 3 (NMR results), Table 4 Table 6 (GC-MS results), and Figure 3, NMR and GC-MS methods identify a common set of 29 compounds.
Lastly, statistical standardization within assessment methods provided a common set of z-scores which would be expected to improve inter-laboratory comparability.
While both methods revealed a common set of 376 transcripts whose expression was altered by PHA-stimulation, Tempus™-prepared specimens revealed an additional 189 up-regulated transcripts that were not detected in PAXgene™-prepared specimens, many of which fall into the category of immune response or cellular proliferation transcripts.
