The phrase "a common sense concept" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an idea or notion that is generally understood and accepted by most people as being logical or reasonable.
Example: "The idea of treating others with respect is a common sense concept that everyone should embrace."
Alternatives: "a basic understanding" or "an intuitive idea".
In this way Strawson turns a common sense concept, viz.
Strawson elsewhere rejects such an interpretation as "revisionary metaphysics" while metaphysics based on material things or substances is "descriptive," but these adjectives are themselves in need of a convincing justification — as long as an ontological category fully captures the inferential content of a common sense concept, it is as descriptive as any other.
Alternatively, one can argue against Dennett that (14) and (15) are not really part of the common sense concept of pain (Conee 1984, Kaufman 1985, Guirguis 1998).
An intermediate position is revisionary materialism, which will often argue that the mental state in question will prove to be somewhat reducible to physical phenomena - with some changes to the common sense concept.
To some this may seem to be a simple solution and one steeped in common sense, concepts that spurn scorn and ire amongst the creatures of the netherworld.
✓ SenticNet [28] Uses dimensionality reduction to infer the polarity of common sense concepts and hence provide a resource for mining opinions from text at a semantic, rather than just syntactic level.
What's surprising about this analysis is that it suggests that built in to common sense concepts of memory is a reliance on the existence of some kind of 'memory trace' as a continuous bridge across the temporal gap, causally connecting past and present.
Nonetheless, the idea that our common sense concepts of mental states reveal an essential tie between mental states and their typical behavioral expressions is retained, and elaborated, in contemporary "analytic" functionalist theories.
There is little reason to expect scientific and common sense concepts to agree in general, so if medicine and everyday thought disagree about disease, we may ask which concept should be adopted.
He also says that it is based on a "common sense," defined as a subjective principle which allows us to judge by feeling rather than concepts (§20).
