The phrase "a common operator" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to mathematics, programming, or any field where operations are performed frequently.
Example: "In programming, a common operator used for addition is the plus sign (+)."
Alternatives: "a frequently used operator" or "a standard operator".
A key benefit of exhibiting common operators is the regular architecture it brings when implemented in a Common Operator Bank (COB).
"The similarities we see between malware linked to that group and WannaCry are not unique enough to be strongly suggestive of a common operator," FireEye researcher John Miller said.
The inter-assay variation of ELISPOT and multimer assays remained consistent whether measured ex vivo or post-IVS as would be predicted based on the execution of replicates by a common operator (Table 2; for a breakdown of the inter-assay %CV for individual centres see Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).
There are several definitions of the fractional derivative/integral as a one common operator known as "differintegral" (see, e.g., [4 6]): The Riemann-Liouville (RL) definition is given as (2.1).
Moreover the family is jointly diagonalized by a common unitary operator explicitly constructed by a Newton type algorithm.
These numbers indicate that the two classes are extremely unbalanced, and that a common 'receiving operator characteristic' analysis is not appropriate to address the goodness of our scores.
Hierarchical logistic regression showed that the sensitivity did depend on the type of x-ray being interpreted but the diagnostic odds ratios did not vary significantly with prevalence, suggesting that doctors were changing their implicit threshold between the two populations along a common receiver operator characteristic curve.
Selection of the wrong target vessel, especially in the setting of complex vascular anatomy, and/or selection of an ROI which is too big or too small are common operator dependent errors.
This paper capitalizes on the common operator technique to present new common structures for the FFT and FEC decoding algorithms.
To check the efficiency of these operators, a comparison is undertaken between these operators and partially mapped crossover (PMX) which is the common operator for sequential problem like TSP and VRP. Figure 6 illustrates this comparison.
The faults used in mutation testing typically represent real coding errors made by developers, while in our approach, we use faults that represent typical data quality problems (which are essentially the effect of common operator errors mixed with the effect of developer mistakes or bad practices).
