Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a common nonsense" is not correct in standard English usage.
It may be intended to describe something that is widely regarded as nonsensical, but the construction is awkward.
Example: "The idea that we can solve all our problems with technology is a common nonsense that many people believe."
Alternatives: "a widespread fallacy" or "a frequent absurdity".
Exact(3)
The idea that putting a number on it makes it more reliable than not putting a number on it is a common nonsense.
This included a common nonsense mutation K1019X that showed an association with PC in AA men that had a family history of PC even after adjusting for admixture.
Huusko et al. recently described a variety of EPHB2 mutations in prostate tumours and in cell-lines [11], and a common nonsense mutation has been associated with prostate cancer in African American men with a family history of this disease [12].
Similar(57)
As Alexander Zaitchik reports in his informative study of Beck, "Common Nonsense," the new book became an object of controversy in 1987, after the California Bicentennial Commission sold it as part of a fund-raising drive.
Common Nonsense: Who's Regulating the Regulators?
Common nonsense has its place and purpose, too.
Molly Coyne, Common Nonsense: Who's Regulating the Regulators?, 42 Ecology L. Q. 209 (2015).
The purpose of this exercise is to identify the "common nonsense" — the beliefs everyone holds that are actually not hard laws of nature.
So long, in fact, that irresponsible ideas have circulated everywhere and built acceptable forms of common sense (or common nonsense), such that thoughtful ideas do seem unbalanced, extreme, or worse.
The c.637C>T (p.R213*) mutant is the most common nonsense mutation in TP53, and is actually more common than many missense mutations in human tumors (see also http://p53.free.fr).fr
Some evidence exists for regional genetic differences, in that certain severe mutations (common nonsense mutations) identified in North America and Europe have not been observed in the Asia Pacific region.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com