The phrase "a common classification for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing categories or types of something that are widely recognized or accepted.
Example: "In biology, a common classification for living organisms is the Linnaean system, which categorizes them into kingdoms, phyla, and classes."
Alternatives: "a widely accepted categorization for" or "a standard classification for".
Commission Regulation (EU) No 31/2011 of 17 January 2011 amending annexes toRegulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1046/2012 of 8 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) as regards the transmission of the time series for the new regional breakdown (OJ L 310, 9.11.2012, p. 34).
Towards a Common Classification of Ecosystem Services.
These costs were allocated to one of eight categories, a common classification used for hospital invoices in Belgium: PD hospitalization costs, honoraria for medical and allied health-care services, pharmacy costs, blood products, clinical chemistry, radiology, graft products, and a miscellaneous category [ 7].
"We sell something to every SIC code," Mr. Anderson said, referring to a common classification system for industries.
Instead of transforming the data into a common classification scheme for each one of these fields, we create CDEs that record each field definition from each data source.
The local government source documents were originally compiled at various scales, with varying enhancements to a common classification system, and for differing time frames (target planning years ranged from 2000 to 2020).
A common classification scheme was used for a visual interpretation of Corona images from the 1960s and an automated classification of Landsat scenes from 1986, 2000/2001 and 2009.
There seems to be a lack of shared definitions or taxonomy necessary for a common classification, which, therefore, results in terminological ambiguity (Klabbers, 2009).
A common classification system is needed to build a common understanding and bridge the knowledge gap.
