The phrase "a common argument for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a frequently made point or reasoning in support of a particular idea or position.
Example: "A common argument for renewable energy is that it reduces our dependence on fossil fuels."
Alternatives: "a frequent justification for" or "a typical rationale for".
A common argument for vouchers is that they improve public schools by forcing them to compete for students.
It is a common argument for the study of classics that the Greeks and Romans are our cultural ancestors, that we carry their legacy, and that understanding our classical roots will somehow help us to understand ourselves.
A common argument for buying is, 'Why would you pay monthly rent to a landlord instead of building equity in a home for yourself?' In reality, there are many financial reasons why renting may be more compelling.
A common argument for allowing the government broad powers to spy without oversight is that only those with something to hide will be targeted.
The argument that more firearms would result in greater security -- especially in cases such as the one over the weekend -- has been a common argument for gun-rights activists, bolstered by headlines such as this.
A common argument for this is that cell lines are not representative of the actual tumor diversity and heterogeneity [ 2].
Dean Baker and Josh Bivens' analysis, "The wrong tool for the right job," tries to rebut an increasingly common argument for a Fed interest rate hike that could hit Americans in their wallets.
These statistics call into question a common argument against government support for arts and culture — that they are helpful to have around but not essential drivers of economic growth.
Savage concluded by reiterating a more common argument for backing the Democratic candidate: that only whiter, more privileged people can afford to risk allowing Trump to be elected president.
It is, for example, a common argument that Evans must never resume his job because he is a "role model" to young men.
By the logic of a common argument against Colorado Amendment 63 and for mandatory medical insurance, the answer is "Yes". Mandatory insurance treats your body as a means to political ends, rather than respecting your rights as an individual.
