The phrase "a collective process in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a process that involves multiple individuals or groups working together towards a common goal or outcome.
Example: "The project was successful due to a collective process in decision-making that included input from all team members."
Alternatives: "a collaborative process in" or "a joint process in".
(We can imagine the process being carried out by individuals, for example, as citizens thinking about an issue of basic justice or judges about a matter of constitutional essentials, and as a collective process, in public deliberation.
Although gaining informed consent at an individual level is increasingly being emphasized in many East Asian countries, it continues to be a collective process in practice, where consent would also involve the research participant's family members or members of his or her broader community [ 68].
They were in fact engaged in a collective process that in the business world was coming to be called "knowledge creation" (Nonaka & Takeuchi [1995]) but which we had already labeled "Knowledge Building" (Scardamalia et al. [1994])—a collaborative effort to advance the state of knowledge and ideas in a community.
No such discussion (either with colleagues and/or nursing staff, and/or described as a part of a "collective" process) was reported in 14% of cases.
The absorber array is bound to the thermistor array in a collective process.
This is actually a step forward in a process that will continue for a long, long time: people are becoming more digitally literate – breaking barriers of what to write and read and how to trust new sources, contributing to the body of human knowledge, in a collective process that has had little precedent and enormous value.
But practiced gently enough, it is a great tool for engagement the professor gets constant feedback on what the students are understanding and what they are not, and the class is involved in a collective process of discovery, where students learn that by careful analysis they can unearth insights that they had previously missed.
They have invited the surrounding community to participate in a collective process of discovering what it might mean to be free on Ohlone land.
This case demonstrates how policy change can occur in the absence of strong political imperatives or ideological contestation, and the ways in which a collective process was used to achieve successful outcomes.
The story selection process involved reading all of the stories from the relevant state to the panel members who were given time to reflect on each story and then, through a collective process, select the four stories that, in their view, best represented the 'most significant change'.
Yet again in accordance with the scope of my contribution, the inclusion of political actors is the answer of the Foresight approach to the challenge "to present the outcomes from the collective process in a way that they are likely to be taken up by policy-making, taking into account its continuously-changing nature" [18].
