At the end of a collaborative testing session, each student will have two scores: the initial score and the final score.
Hence, this article provides an overview of our collaborative test results in order to obtain a performance benchmark for these approaches.
A large number of collaborative test results including those generated under the International Energy Agency IEAA) implementing agreements are collected and are used to evaluate the feasibility of using reduced-activation martensitic steels for fusion reactor structural materials, with F82H as one of the reference alloys.
A collaborative pointing test software (CPTS) program was designed in this experiment to evaluate participants' collaborative pointing performance.
However, unlike our study, in which students only consulted one another during the group test, students in the Bloom study were allowed to consult their books and notes in addition to their peers during the collaborative test.
This paper presents a computer supported collaborative testing system built upon the Siette web-based assessment environment.
This paper presents some of the results obtained with four different ENs on a series of collaborative tests carried out on six standard fruit samples, pure liquids and mixtures.
To address this issue, a set of international, collaborative testing programs was established to evaluate the Salmonella assay as well as several other mutagenicity assays using coded chemicals from the same lot (Ashby et al. 1985, 1988; de Serres et al. 1981) and standard protocols (Dunkel et al. 1984, 1985; Margolin et al. 1984; Piegorsch and Zeiger 1991).
It is unlikely that the failure to observe an improvement in content retention by collaborative testing was due to a general failure of our students to engage in the group testing process, since improvement in group scores over individual scores for our study (14.8%) was comparable to the two studies that did report increased content retention (16% [ Bloom, 2009] and 18% [ Cortright et al., 2003]).
