The phrase "a collaborative landscape" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an environment or setting where collaboration and teamwork are emphasized or encouraged.
Example: "In today's business world, fostering a collaborative landscape is essential for innovation and success."
Alternatives: "a cooperative environment" or "a teamwork-oriented setting".
Here, a collaborative landscape governance process started off with low levels of trust between farmers and regional governments, as a result of previous processes.
We further suggest a collaborative landscape model for biodiversity conservation featuring institutional linkages and integration between community-conserved areas, integrated conservation corridors for connectivity, and dynamic, mobile reserves collaboratively integrated with national parks management.
A collaborative landscape management plan was completed in 2007 and included creation of management objectives, assessment of current forest, stream, and road network conditions, modeling of alternative restoration treatments, and a restoration framework.
The embedding of ILTER in an increasingly collaborative landscape of global environmental observation and ecological research networks and infrastructures is also reflected by developments of pioneering regional and national LTER networks such as SAEON in South Africa, CERN/CEOBEX in China, TERN in Australia or eLTER RI in Europe.
The framework is illustrated by a spatial planning experiment with academic students and by a case of collaborative landscape planning.
However, landscape services can also be used as a boundary concept in collaborative landscape governance.
This paper reflects on collaborative landscape research conducted in Reunion Island, an outermost region of the European Union.
The ecosystem services concept has so far received little attention in scientific literature about collaborative landscape planning.
The significance of our paper is that we provide an approach to investigate how information on ecosystem service benefits is processed by multiple actors in collaborative landscape planning processes.
The case analysis shows how researchers who facilitated collaborative landscape planning used various frames as they attempted to build up the actor network to create collaborative relations in different phases of the planning process.
The process we used can serve as an example for developing collaborative, landscape-scale, conservation priorities for data-sparse metapopulations.
