The phrase "a coherent rationale for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasoning or justification behind a particular decision, action, or belief.
Example: "The committee provided a coherent rationale for the proposed changes to the policy, ensuring that all members understood the reasoning behind the decision."
Alternatives: "a clear justification for" or "a logical explanation for".
Even as his actions become increasingly desperate, he has a coherent rationale for his behavior.
Ideas like Grotius's mattered because they provided a coherent rationale for what was happening in the world willy-nilly.
"We simply don't have a coherent rationale for what it is we call charity," Professor Colombo said.
While Clinton had a 20-point plan ready for every question, she failed to weave it all together into anything that resembled a coherent rationale for her candidacy.
Obama has added another interesting twist to his campaign by seizing this opportunity and articulating a coherent rationale for the expansion of the faith-based office under his administration.
The brightest luminaries in the Russian democratic constellation are unable to offer their supporters a coherent rationale for action.
These spiraling stories are entertaining in their absurdity but don't provide a particularly coherent rationale for Howard's emergence from the afterlife as a spiritual guide for Olive et al. Then again, ghosts don't have to obey the demanding laws of satisfying dramaturgy, as we expect playwrights to.
A beautifully constructed story is where a statistic inspires action and a coherent rationale is transformed into a compelling call to action.
The current work lacks a coherent rationale, experimental structure, mechanistic basis, and physiological relevance.
But, so far, the only ones who have articulated a clear and coherent rationale for their candidacies are Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt). and Warren, both of whom want to attack the political and economic power of plutocrats, and now Inslee.
It did not for two basic reasons: The White House was under pressure to focus on the economy and proved inept at multimessaging, and officials never settled on a consistent and coherent rationale for the law.
