Sentence examples for a closed review from inspiring English sources

And the IHOP Corporation began a closed review for its creative account, with spending estimated at more than $25 million, as it parted ways after more than two years with Heil-Brice Retail AdvertisiNewport Beach, Calif Calif.

Princess Cruises, part of Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation, is beginning a closed review for an agency of record to handle its account, with billings estimated at $20 million.

In journals like Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP), your work becomes public in pretty much the form that it was in when you submitted it, prior to the thorough vetting that a closed review process typically provides.

Also be aware that, even in a closed review system, it may be difficult to guarantee your anonymity: Although rare, breaches of confidentiality do happen, or perhaps you're in a subspecialty that is so small that you'll be easily identified as the reviewer.

They also point out that open review has a higher rejection rate compared to closed review [ 11].

ICCVAM must also operate with a high level of transparency and the opportunity for broad public and stakeholder input in contrast to ECVAM's less-extensive closed review process.

It is important to note that F1000Research does not consider these statuses as equivalent to the accepted, accepted with revisions, and rejected statuses that one sees in closed review processes.

One criticism of open peer review is that, under the gaze of all and sundry, reviewers tend to be too gentle, and Dr McNutt fears that inadequate criticism might do more of a disservice to science than the "bruised sensibilities from closed reviews".As a result, several journals, including some from the prestigious Nature stable, have moved in the opposite direction.

He said that if a closed-door review of the income tax returns showed that Enron had complied with all tax laws, he would then focus on changing those laws so that corporations could not eliminate income taxes through the use of partnerships in tax havens.

At a closed meeting to review the study in March, researchers and patient groups raised several issues, including whether long-term side effects, such as a heightened risk of osteoporosis and heart attacks (two conditions estrogen protects against), would prevent letrozole from being used in clinical practice.

It would be appropriate for a closed judgment to suggest a review point, and for all closed judgments to be compulsorily reviewed, for instance, every five years.