The phrase "a classification may be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential nature or type of a classification in various contexts, such as academic, scientific, or organizational discussions.
Example: "In biological taxonomy, a classification may be based on genetic similarities among species."
Alternatives: "a classification could be" or "a classification might be".
While such a classification may be derived from various imaging methods, a shortcoming is often the simultaneous characterisation of the connectivity between regions representing different micro-structure.
To this destructive end it is apparent the argument must come, since it assumes that however completely a classification may be justified by general considerations, such classification may not be made if inequalities be detected as to some persons embraced within the general class by a critical analysis of the relation of the persons or things otherwise embraced within the general class.
However, if the object of the statute is itself illegitimate, a classification may be invalid even if it satisfies the test.
According to the RIAS-manual[ 35, 36], "utterances" are defined as the smallest distinguishable speech segment to which a classification may be assigned.
In the RIAS-coding system the communication units are defined as utterances - the smallest discriminable speech segment to which a classification may be assigned [ 41, 42].
In some benchmark studies, a binary classification may be insufficient for capturing complexity.
When local improvements may be deemed to result in special benefits, a further classification may be made and special assessments imposed accordingly; but even in such case there is no requirement of the Federal Constitution that for every payment there must be an equal benefit.
The later course of the disease or further information emerging might require different treatment decisions or suggests that a different classification may be more appropriate than the one initially attributed.
Nonetheless, the inclusion of an intermediate classification may be useful in identifying persons who have pre-clinical physical function impairment.
However, given that such a method of classification may be subject to complications arising from normal within individual variation in gene expression levels, we reclassified genes using increasing stage-specificity thresholds (see Methods, Table 1 and Additional file 4).
In addition to the current FAO definitions, comments to IPCC preliminary definitons include that an area-oriented land classification may be a poor indicator of carbon storages and fluxes.
