The phrase "a classical argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing formal reasoning, debate, or persuasive writing, often referring to a traditional method of argumentation.
Example: "In her essay, she presented a classical argument that emphasized the importance of logic and evidence in persuading an audience."
Alternatives: "a traditional argument" or "a formal argument".
The emphasis on language as the eminent medium for the representation of human freedom reproduces a classical argument that is already at the heart of Hegel's aesthetics (a fact that the existentialists are fully aware of [Sartre 1948a, 5]).
Using (5.4) and employing a classical argument (see e.g. [13, Proposition 4.6.4, p. 198], the same proof works fine in our case), we obtain that begin{aligned} sigma (lambda _j)sim frac{(2pi )^{d}}{C'} j, quad jrightarrow infty.
By a classical argument biglVert R x,theta -R(x_{0},theta -RgrVert geqx_{theta) |x-x_{0}|,theta bigrVert x_{0}in H. Since (x_{0}) is solution of SVMQVIP (1.1), (R(x_{0},theta)=0) and hence |x-x_{0}|leq{4over {4alphatheta-beta^{2}mu^{2}theta^{2} -4k}}bigeqxitheta,theta)bigrVert.
However, a classical argument against data generated in knockout models is the modification of a variety of other gene products regulated secondarily to the life-long-gene deficiency, but being responsible for the described phenotype.
A standard classical argument for tackling the boundary value problem for elliptic partial differential equations is based on reformulating the equation as an integral equation by using a Green's function and then invoking the theory of integral equations.
In such a view, the more classical argument that the market should decide over consumer preferences only after products were available is misplaced.
As we have seen, given common knowledge of the game and of rationality, forward induction reasoning can lead the agents to an apparent contradiction: The classical argument for backwards induction is predicated on what agents predict they would do at nodes in the tree that are never reached.
It is essential to notice that the necessity at stake in the classical argument is a historical necessity.
The second method treats the problem as a three-phase situation and mimics the classical argument of Young.
We also show that one can recover exact controllability in abstract spaces from this 2D spectral controllability, by adapting a classical variational argument from control theory.
A classical regularity argument shows that u is a classical solution of (6), which implies that u ¨ ( t ) is bounded for t ∈ ( t j, t j + 1 ), and this implies that lim t → t j + u ˙ ( t ) and lim t → t j + 1 − u ˙ ( t ) exist.
