The phrase "a change in viewpoint" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a shift in perspective or opinion on a particular subject.
Example: "After reading the article, I experienced a change in viewpoint regarding climate change and its impact on our planet."
Alternatives: "a shift in perspective" or "a change in perspective."
What's hopeful about these latter results, Lowery says, is that a change in viewpoint toward another ethnic group can come from within a social group through positive and appealing role models who exhibit justice-minded attitudes — an important factor given that widespread segregation often makes it difficult for various groups to interact.
The appearance of objects (e.g., its color and shape) may change as the result of a change in viewpoint.
The distance metrics defined above cannot account for low-level transformation such as when there is a change in viewpoint or there is an affine transformation of the low-level features.
The drive that fuels Sangari's vision of social revolution is decidedly more Ghandi than Che: it demands freedom for a change in the viewpoint and practice of the people themselves, rather than a change of politics.
A recent change in viewpoint, however, has demonstrated that working in phase space on bicharacteristic strips using eulerian methods can bypass both difficulties.
Looking at Zabicki's paintings in tandem with SLAC could also offer a beneficial change in viewpoint, both to how communities view artists and creative work and how artists conceive of their possible roles within their community.
This change in viewpoint rationalizes a change in experimental strategies for dissecting sex chromosome effects.
According to Whitehead, recognition that the world is organic rather than materialistic is essential for anyone wanting to develop a comprehensive account of nature, and this change in viewpoint can result as easily from attempts to understand human psychology and teleology as from attempts to understand modern physics.
In the second method, we take the change in viewpoint focus, analogous to a window-sliding approach.
Rhetorical questions like, "If you're Mike Shanahan what do you do?" only later turned into declarative statements like, "Shanahan should be fired for letting him play!" The sudden change in viewpoint was bolstered by outcomes-based logic.
I thought structuring the book by having the chapters being called scenes of a continuation of Ryan's imaginary TV programme about his life was really effective as it facilitates change in viewpoints and various flashbacks in such a way that didn't seem forced or clunky.
