The phrase "a change in technical" is not correct as it is incomplete and lacks clarity.
It could be used in contexts discussing modifications or updates in technical aspects, but it needs to be followed by a noun to specify what is changing.
Example: "The project requires a change in technical specifications to meet the new standards."
Alternatives: "a shift in technical" or "an adjustment in technical".
The question addressed is whether the adoption of incentive regulation, which has become an important regulatory tool in the telecommunications industry in the United States, has resulted in a change in the technical efficiency of local exchange carriers in the United States.
This was the result of a change in the technical rules this season with the addition of a movable rear wing to allow for a power boost down the straight, and for another power-boost device that reuses kinetic energy stored during braking.
Or, the information might have previously been restricted to only certain friends, but a change in the technical platform suddenly made the data more visible to all.
We performed analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to examine which of the aforementioned predictor variables yield a significant contribution to the perceived extent to which MPH contributed to a change in leadership, technical position, employer, and/or increase in remuneration.
However, an increase in complications without a corresponding change in technical difficulty suggests that patient physiologic factors such as deconditioning or sequelae of critical illness may drive this effect, rather than anatomic airway factors.
Mark Taglietti, head of ICT delivery services and vendor management at London University College Hospitals says, "Google Glass represents a step change in technical innovation, wearable technology, and the convergence of personal devices in the workplace.
For the fan component manufacturing enterprises, the scale efficiency remained "almost flat" during the sampling period, as the change of the comprehensive efficiency is mainly based upon a change in the pure technical efficiency, whereas the pure technical efficiency is below the scale efficiency most of the time.
For the wind farm generation and operation enterprises, the scale efficiency remained flat from 2012 to 2015, whereas a change of the comprehensive efficiency was mainly based upon a change in the pure technical efficiency.
Only when the efficacy data become stronger, particularly with respect to overall survival, or the differences in toxicity becomes greater, are we likely to see a change in the ASCO technical review on adjuvant AIs, which emphasises the strength of the tamoxifen experience and the preliminary nature of the ATAC trial data (Winer et al, 2002, 2003).
