"a challenge for cause" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something that needs to be resolved or overcome. For example: "The difficult project was a challenge for cause, but eventually, we managed to succeed."
Though this requirement imposes a limitation in some cases on the full peremptory character of the historic challenge, we emphasize that the prosecutor's explanation need not rise to the level justifying exercise of a challenge for cause.
To rebut a prima facie case, the Court requires a "neutral explanation" for the challenge, but is at pains to "emphasize" that the "explanation need not rise to the level justifying exercise of a challenge for cause". I am at a loss to discern the governing principles here.
Proponents argue that doing away with peremptories altogether will eliminate the perceived and real injustice of permitting lawyers to eliminate jurors dispositionally unfavorable to them without a challenge for cause argument in open court.
The first option is a challenge for cause, in which attorneys must state the reason for a challenge (such as clear bias or a conflict of interest), the opposing party is allowed to respond, and the judge decides whether to exclude the juror.
Raising a child diagnosed with infantile cerebral palsy is a challenge for families and causes many changes in their lifestyle.
Here reasons for dismissal are given: the prospective juror said that he couldn't be neutral after reading about the case in the newspapers, or he replied yes to the question "Do you think police officers are more believable than ordinary citizens?" If the judge grants the challenge for cause, the challenging attorney does not use up one of his peremptory challenges.
The appellate court explained that after the trial judge denied the challenge for cause, the prosecutor used a peremptory challenge to remove the juror.
The judge, Joseph E. Gary, refused to allow the defense to challenge for cause prospective jurors who had already formed a settled opinion of the defendants' guilt.
With dozens of policies in place at the same time at the state and district levels, broader economic and social trends, and the quality of application all factoring into a program's success, he said, it is a challenge for researchers to untangle the causes and effects of individual practices.
And the fact that companies like Apple are starting to figure it out is causing a challenge for law enforcement that they've never had before".
