The phrase "a certain evaluative" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where you are referring to a specific type of evaluation or assessment, but it would need more context to clarify its meaning.
Example: "In the study, we focused on a certain evaluative approach to measure student performance."
Alternatives: "a specific evaluation" or "a particular assessment".
Consequently, we might say along the lines of Section 4.3, while particular emotions appraise events in the world as having certain evaluative properties, their having these properties is partly bestowed on them by the overall patterns of emotions.
The implications of making this activity explicit are highly practical: at every phase of work, certain evaluative and normative questions must be asked, and made explicit, such as: what is the fundamental question to be addressed?
(Roughly, and taking the notion of an evaluative property as fundamental: for a notion to be normative is for it to be a certain sort of evaluative notion, one that is essentially action-guiding; for a notion to be moral is for it to be a certain sort of normative notion, one that exhibits impartiality).
Highlights the evaluation of considerations as a basis of deliberation: the benefits or burdens of a policy, causality of a certain policy and the evaluative values to be considered.
The main danger for such approaches is that in seeking to preserve and defend a certain picture of the primordial role of evaluative thought in rational action a picture critics are likely to dismiss as too rationalistic such theorists may be led to reject common phenomena which ought properly to have constrained their more abstract theories.
You might say about a certain comedy that it's a witty comedy, for example; that is an evaluative judgment about it". While judging something to be witty might appear to be an expression of pure preference, Thomson said that such a judgment is factual as well as evaluative.
So Nietzsche, on this account, does not claim that his evaluative perspective is veridical; he simply claims that it enjoys a certain sort of interpersonal appeal, owing to our "common attitude to remarkable men," "our tendency to admire certain individuals," to find them aesthetically appealing.
In written monologic discourse, each evaluative coupling is assumed to be shared by the writers and a certain group of readers.
If, on the other hand, the postulate that a certain operatio is the proper (or even a proper) function of human beings is asserted to be itself evaluative and/or normative rather than, or as well as, factual/descriptive, then some account is needed of the postulate's source or justification (or self-evidence?).
