The phrase "a centralized version" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a single, unified version of something that is managed or controlled from a central point.
Example: "The team decided to create a centralized version of the document to ensure everyone had access to the most up-to-date information."
Alternatives: "a unified version" or "a consolidated version."
We provide a centralized version, as well as a distributed asynchronous version of the algorithm.
Last year the team demoed a centralized version of the algorithm using a pair of wheeled robots tasked with carrying an object together.
Comparing an average network throughput per SU, we can conclude that the distributed algorithm achieves 5%% lower average throughput per user compared to a centralized version of the algorithm with the advantage of a faster algorithm convergence and reduced network complexity and communications overhead.
Usually it is a centralized version of the same sound, with the following exceptions: preceding /u/ produces [e]; /i/ will be ignored if there is a nonneutral vowel earlier in the word; and a postalveolar or palatalized consonant will be followed by an epenthetic [i], as in [atʃĭɮ].
Third, we illustrated a centralized version of the complete network of pathways and GOBP, providing insights of critical routes from and to the main pathway, h_amiPathway.
After the design of LEACH protocol, these authors further proposed a new centralized version called LEACH_C in [2].
Using the Medical Imaging Processing Analysis and Visualization software (MIPAV, version 4.1.2), two trained analysts evaluated each CT scan independently at a centralized reading center (UCSD, La Jolla, CA).
Its main advantage is that although it is computed in a distributed way, it converges to the solution of the centralized version.
We analyze the centralized version of the supply chain to obtain new coordination requirements.
Finally, simulation results show that the distributed MPC solution achieves control performance quite close to the centralized version with less computing effort.
We prove finite time convergence in its centralized version, and by using the tool of average consensus we design its distributed implementation in the case in which a communication graph is given.
