a cash of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a cash of" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a misinterpretation or typo, as "cash" typically does not pair with "of" in this context. Example: "I found a stash of cash hidden in the drawer."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Think of the present global capitalist moment not as a "clash," but a "cash of civilizations".

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The Class P4-A Cash Pool consists of cash in the amount of $4.4 million.

Harvard University

A cash payment of 50,000 Indonesian Rupiah (~USD 5) was paid to participants to cover their out-of-pocket expenditure.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

It listed a cash stockpile of $628 million.

The New York Times

Sabin winners also receive a cash prize of $25,000.

Yale University

Each winner receives a cash award of $10,000.

Harvard University

Each winner receives a cash award of $4,000.

Harvard University

The honor brings a cash prize of $15,000.

Princeton University

In exchange it promises a cash injection of €3.1 billion.

The Economist

Ms. Davis, at that point, had a cash balance of $1.1 million.

The New York Times

The winning play receives a a cash prize of $2,500.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "a cash of" in formal writing. Opt for more standard expressions like "a sum of cash" or "amount of cash". This ensures clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

The phrase "a cash of" is not grammatically correct when intending to describe an amount. Using "of" incorrectly implies that 'cash' is a container. Instead, use phrases like "a sum of cash" or "an amount of cash" to correctly denote the quantity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a cash of" appears to function as a determiner followed by a noun, attempting to quantify cash. However, according to Ludwig, this construction is not considered correct in standard English. The proper way to quantify cash would be to use expressions like "a sum of cash" or "an amount of cash".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a cash of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As highlighted by Ludwig, it's more appropriate to use alternatives such as "a sum of cash" or "an amount of cash" to accurately describe a quantity of money. While the intended meaning is clear, adhering to standard grammatical practices ensures clarity and professionalism in writing. The phrase is infrequently used and appears across various contexts like News, Academia and Science.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a sum of money

Focuses on the total amount of money involved, replacing the general term 'cash'.

a quantity of cash

Emphasizes the amount of cash, providing a more descriptive substitute.

a supply of funds

Highlights the availability of money for a specific purpose.

a stock of money

Suggests a reserve or accumulation of money that has been gathered over time.

a reserve of capital

Implies a strategic fund set aside for future use.

a pool of assets

Broadens the scope to include various types of assets, not just cash.

a trove of riches

Indicates a large and valuable collection of wealth.

a hoard of currency

Emphasizes a hidden or guarded collection of money.

a cache of valuables

Refers to a hidden store of valuable items, including or beyond cash.

a bundle of banknotes

Specifically refers to a collection of paper money.

FAQs

Is the phrase "a cash of" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "a cash of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "a sum of cash" or "an amount of cash".

What are some alternatives to "a cash of" for describing money?

Instead of "a cash of", you can use alternatives such as "a sum of money", "amount of cash", or "a supply of funds". Each alternative may fit better depending on the specific context.

How can I use "amount of cash" in a sentence?

You can use "amount of cash" in a sentence like this: "The company reported a significant "amount of cash" on its balance sheet."

What is the difference between "a sum of cash" and "a stash of cash"?

"A sum of cash" refers to a specific amount of money, whereas "a stash of cash" implies a hidden or reserved quantity of money. A "sum" focuses on quantity, while a "stash" focuses on storage or secrecy.