The phrase "a case of knowledge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a specific instance or example where knowledge is relevant or applicable.
Example: "In this research paper, we will examine a case of knowledge that illustrates the importance of historical context in understanding modern events."
Alternatives: "an instance of knowledge" or "a situation of knowledge".
At the symposium, researchers said the interest in learning more about chimps was not just a case of knowledge for the sake of knowledge.
It was a case of knowledge changing my life.
By reasoning in justification logic it was concluded that [\(a\cdot v ]: B\) is a case of knowledge, i.e., 'I know \(B\) for reason \(a\cdot v\)'.
The fact that \ u : B\) is not a case of knowledge does not spoil the closure principle, since the latter claims knowledge specifically for [\(a\cdot v ]: B\).
One doesn't, it seems, use one's senses to discern if some hypothetical case is a case of knowledge or right action or a case in which the hypothetical entity is conscious or in which two temporally distinct persons are the same person.
Since this is an extremely implausible stance, let us take it that P3 does convey knowledge of M. But what property does P3 actually have that makes it a case of conveying knowledge of M? Epiphenomenalists will wish to point out that P3 does not have any property that contains information as to how it was caused.
Although, as I have indicated, Moore did not intend his 'proof' as a refutation of skepticism, he did frequently argue against skeptical views; and in his early writings, despite the passage quoted just now, he does sometimes give the impression that he thinks one can refute skepticism by simply bringing forward a straightforward case of knowledge, such as 'I know that this is a pencil'.
In addition, the provision of privacy and confidentiality could be regarded as a special case of knowledge processing, which involves knowledge about the proper use (e.g., access, modification, transfer) of individual knowledge.
These cases are supposed to show that a belief can be justified and true, without being an intuitive case of knowledge.
Might that be a case of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing?
It's then a case of using this knowledge to convince your audience that you are the best candidate for the job.
