"a case at hand" is correct and can be used in written English.
It means a specific situation or problem that is currently being discussed or dealt with. Example: The judge carefully considered the evidence presented in the case at hand before making his final decision.
And then everything else I basically view as just a case at hand".
All the more reason, before a final count in a case at hand, for his clerks to try to find out enough about the thinking going on in the other chambers.
Ganeri (2001b: 20) claims that it is better to understand both the Buddhist and early Nyāya patterns as "not enthymematic," not skipping a step of generalization and then implicitly using universal instantiation (UI) and modus ponens (MP) in applying the rule to a case at hand.
Evans not as a parallel to the case at hand but as a case that established the proper basis of review for the law at issue.
Fortunately, a case is at hand for the justices to do so in an appeal from the District of Columbia Circuit.
Thinking through which of two analogous cases provides a better key to understanding the case at hand is a useful way of organizing our moral reasoning, and one on which we must continue to depend.
Unlike the bail-out approach, the bail-in method is much closer to what is observed in a true bankruptcy proceeding: the petitioner is insolvent, so haircuts of some magnitude must be suffered by the relevant creditors, but no haircuts at all are imposed on the general public, which stands outside the courtroom and is not a party to the case at hand.
Arguments by analogy complement arguments from precedent in two ways: (i) they are used when the facts of a case do not fall within the ratio of any precedent, in order to assimilate the result to that in the analogical case; and (ii) they are used when the facts of a case do fall within the ratio of a precedent, as a basis for distinguishing the case at hand from the precedent.
And only a few months ago (just weeks before the district court issued its opinion in the case at hand), a three-judge court addressed a redistricting plan adopted by the same General Assembly that enacted SL 2013-381.
This could be explained by their tendency to spend more time at low magnification at the start of the diagnostic process (e.g., to create an overview for the case at hand).
Remember that we can always reopen an investigation whenever we like". While the case at hand provides a horrific example of corporate greed and government military contracts run-amuck.
