Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
First, most of the justices seemed to accept that the First Amendment does not protect calculated falsehoods that cause at least some kinds of harm.
This is a calculated risk.
But, Verrilli continued, "this Court has said in numerous contexts, numerous contexts, that the calculated factual falsehood has no First Amendment value for its own sake".
Relying on these cases, Verrilli stated, "[T]his Court has said in numerous contexts, numerous contexts, that the calculated factual falsehood has no First Amendment value for its own sake".
A) No falsehood can last.
So on Popper's account a falsehood is never more worthwhile than a worthless logical truth.
He calculated a moment.
The Z operator applied to an unknown and anything but a falsehood yields an unknown.
Nonetheless, the legitimacy of a guideline based on a falsehood is questionable.
Recalling a fact is quicker than inventing a falsehood.
It's a falsehood to put a big building behind them.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com