a brief concurrence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a brief concurrence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a short agreement or alignment in opinion or decision-making. Example: "After reviewing the proposal, I can offer a brief concurrence with the suggested changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Long passages of Justice Thomas's opinion read like a science textbook, prompting Justice Antonin Scalia to issue a brief concurrence.

The New York Times

Chief Justice Charles T. Wells wrote a brief concurrence saying that he agreed only with dismissal, not with today's opinion, indicating that he may not agree with the majority of five justices that the Legislature should establish standards for recounting.

The New York Times

In a brief concurrence, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said there was no reason to address the continuing validity of Buckley v. Valeo in that case, suggesting that a later case might present the question directly.

The New York Times

As if to explain his vote, Breyer wrote a brief concurrence to say that he joined his more conservative colleagues "to preserve the status quo" and because the court is currently not in session.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

There was no need for Roberts to write a separate one: his brief concurrence showed how personal the issue has become for him.

The New Yorker

In his brief concurrence, Justice Thomas notes that the parties did not present the issue.

The Economist

So, a brief lesson.

The New York Times

A brief encounter.

Independent

A BRIEF service announcement.

The Economist

A brief summary?

The New Yorker

(A brief staring contest).

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a brief concurrence" in legal or formal writing, ensure it accurately reflects the brevity and scope of the agreement or opinion being referenced. Provide context to clarify the significance of the concurrence.

Common error

Avoid using "a brief concurrence" to describe a situation where the agreement is actually substantial or complex. Ensure the term accurately reflects the limited nature of the agreement to prevent misleading the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a brief concurrence" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a legal or formal agreement that is short and concise. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples show it often appears in descriptions of court opinions.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a brief concurrence" is a correct and usable phrase, typically found in formal contexts like legal and academic writing. According to Ludwig AI, it indicates a short agreement or alignment in opinion, often in legal settings where a judge agrees with an outcome but may have different reasons. While grammatically sound and consistently used, its frequency is rare. For alternative phrasing, consider "short agreement" or "concise agreement" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

short concurring opinion

More specific to legal contexts, maintaining the opinion aspect.

short agreement

Focuses on the agreement itself, rather than the formal legal context.

abridged concurrence

Focuses on shortened or condensed version of concurrence.

concise agreement

Emphasizes the brevity of the agreement.

quick concurrence

Highlights the speed of the agreement.

succinct agreement

Highlights the clear and compact nature of the agreement.

brief affirmation

Uses a more general term for agreement.

brief assent

Implies a formal agreement but keeps it brief.

compact agreement

Agreement is tightly constructed and efficient.

short endorsement

Focuses on support or approval.

FAQs

How is "a brief concurrence" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal settings, "a brief concurrence" usually refers to a short statement by a judge agreeing with the outcome of a ruling but potentially for different reasons than those presented in the main opinion. It's shorter and less detailed than a full concurring opinion.

What's the difference between "a brief concurrence" and a dissent?

While "a brief concurrence" indicates agreement with the final decision, a dissent expresses disagreement. A dissent explains why a judge believes the court's decision is incorrect.

When is it appropriate to use "short agreement" instead of "a brief concurrence"?

You can use "short agreement" in more general contexts where you want to emphasize that there was a quick alignment of understanding but not necessarily in a legal or formal setting. It's less specific than "a brief concurrence".

Can I use "a brief concurrence" to describe an agreement in business?

While technically correct, "a brief concurrence" is more commonly used in legal or academic contexts. In business, phrases like "quick agreement" or "short agreement" might be more appropriate and sound less formal.