The phrase "a book she characterizes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a book that someone is describing or interpreting in a particular way.
Example: "In her review, she discusses a book she characterizes as a profound exploration of human emotions."
Alternatives: "a book she describes" or "a book she depicts".
Nothing I've characterized in the book didn't happen to many people many times.
A package of disco-era hits by the Swedish vocal group Abba draped around a book best characterized as a paternity whodunit set on a Greek island, the show is moving into the former Broadway residence of "Cats," the Winter Garden Theater.
In 1995 Nansook Hong, the wife of his eldest son, Hyo Jin Moon, who at one time was Mr. Moon's heir apparent, broke from the family and wrote a book characterizing her husband as a womanizing cocaine user who watched pornographic movies and beat her, once when she was seven months pregnant.
This passage is one of the most tone-deaf and self-absorbed in a book characterized by tone-deafness and self-absorption.
Ponnuru, who once wrote a book characterizing Democrats as the "Party of Death," undoubtedly needs to trim his rhetorical sails once in a while.
The book, she said, "has been inappropriately and inaccurately characterized as a soft-porn book, which is the most inflammatory rhetoric anyone can use when talking about the subject matter, given the sensitivity of any religious group toward their sacred figures".
The Erik Wemple Blog is reluctant to believe that a major-party presidential nominee would publicly characterize a book without first having read it.
In the book, Penman characterizes King Richard III as a healthy, if misunderstood, ruler.
Early modern English literature engages imaginatively with printing and this book both characterizes that engagement and proposes the typographic imaginary as a framework for its analysis.
Arguing that Twain's iconic work has been misunderstood by modern readers as a story principally about race, this book characterizes it as a satirical comment on the debates that raged at the time regarding "compulsory education, juvenile delinquency, at-risk children, and the different ways we raise boys from girls, and rich from poor".
