The phrase "a better sensitivity for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing improvements in sensitivity related to a specific context, such as scientific measurements or emotional awareness.
Example: "The new device offers a better sensitivity for detecting subtle changes in temperature."
Alternatives: "an improved sensitivity to" or "greater sensitivity for".
FITC/Au1Ag4@SiO2 solution shows a better sensitivity for detecting low concentration of Fe3+ compared to pure FITC solution.
The present study demonstrated that 4DST has a better sensitivity for N staging than FDG in NSCLC, both on a per-patient basis and on a per-node basis.
Moreover, compared to the SRQ according to Grossarth-Maticek, the ICS sum scale and subscales show a better sensitivity for tumour patients in study 1 [ 12].
The KPD feature can therefore be assigned a better sensitivity for evaluation at the greatest physiological threshold when using BSPMs and a considerably better sensitivity for an evaluation at 1.5 times the physiological threshold also in the 12-lead scenario.
Using this method, Savagner et al found that serum Tg-mRNA detection has a better sensitivity for detecting recurrent thyroid cancer than serum Tg measurement, especially during LT4 suppression therapy.
The use of HEp2 cells yields a better sensitivity for the detection of nuclear antigens present during cell division (for example centromere antigen) than the use of tissue sections of murine liver or kidney [ 10].
The choice of NGAL levels as a primary outcome was made on the presumption of a better sensitivity of this test for AKI detection.
They also showed that the anti-EpCAM antibody may compensate for low CK expression, giving a better sensitivity and reproducibility for CTC detection in the new strategy).
Receivers Operating Curve (ROC) analysis indicated a better sensitivity to specificity ratio for PSA/IGF-1 than for PSA or Free/Total (F/T) PSA.
Selzner et al. demonstrated a sensitivity of only 53% for CT, and a much better sensitivity for FDG-PET of 93% [ 7].
For an abrogated feature selection, i.e., using all expressed genes that have read counts of ⊝ = 1 or larger, the higher moments of the distribution of expressed genes showed a much better sensitivity for the signal detection of differing phenotypic conditions than the corresponding mean values (Table 6 ).
