Sentence examples for a better comparator from inspiring English sources

The top-tier consoles right now ship their games on Blu-ray discs, which store at least 25GB and can rise to 128GB per disc (twice the total storage of the highest-capacity Apple TV); but even last generation's Nintendo Wii, which is perhaps a better comparator, used DVDs that hold 5GB.

Measuring adherence to quality control processes (care bundles) may be a better comparator.

Fourth, we used pulmonary function tests as a reference standard, while HRCT would have been a better comparator for structural lung disease, but we do not obtain HRCT scans routinely in our clinic.

Prior to our study, little has been known about the methodological quality of reviews of bench studies, so some might argue that reviews of human studies could have served as a better comparator.

Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) with automode is a better comparator as it delivers pressure control breaths in the absence of triggering and automatically switches to pressure support breaths when triggered.

We agree with the reviewers that LTNPs represent an imperfect surrogate group for functional cure, however, we believe that they represent some of the presently best available examples of viremia control with limited immune suppression over the long-term and this in the absence of a better comparator group of patients.

Wales is arguably a better epidemiological comparator than Northern Ireland, because Wales and England adjoin whereas Northern Ireland and England are on separate islands.

Such parameters should be better comparators from in vitro and in vivo, with a major outstanding challenge being measurement or derivation of them in in vivo systems.

Four studies (14.8%) used an extension of mixed logit, generalised multinomial logit models, with three of these finding a better fit to data than comparator mixed logit or logit models [ 51, 54, 58, 62].

DP provided a better protective effect against P. falciparum recurrence than its comparator groups in Rwanda; compared to AQ+SP (P = 0.006) and AS+AQ (P = 0.006); to AL in Uganda (P = 0.005); and MAS3 in Thailand (P = 0.016).

The aim of this study was to examine if a structured research question using the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Time-frame) format is associated with a better reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).