These data reveal a basic distinction between two types of positive selection effects: those that depend on the presence of another amino acid mutation at a specific site, versus those that do not.
As we shall see below, however, Davidson appears to accept a basic distinction at the heart of the Logical Connection Argument that the rationalizing relationship bears a certain key property (quasi-logical status) that is at odds with the relationship between physically described, causally related events.
All languages, for instance, make a basic distinction between a group of words that prototypically denotes things and concepts and a group of words that prototypically denotes actions and events.
In the 20th century, pattern poetry sometimes crossed paths with concrete poetry; a basic distinction between the two types of poetry is the ability of pattern poetry to hold its meaning apart from its typography i.e., it can be read aloud and still retain its meaning.
Here Heidegger's views have obviously been deeply influenced by Nietzsche's early view that a fundamental conflict between Dionysian and the Apollonian forces is the engine driving the unfolding of history an opposition Heidegger traces back to Hölderlin's positing of a basic distinction between Greek "fire" and German "clarity," as Young (2001, pp. 40-1) shows.
And positing that there is some natural cause for the trait at issue is not helpful as a theory, other than to make a basic distinction between natural selection and supernatural theories of evolution.
Thus, he makes a basic distinction between the thing which is the object of knowledge and the representations (intelligible species) by which one knows them.
A basic distinction between conventional and alternative silvicultural approaches is the relative balance of selected values and objectives.
Although "externalizing" and "internalizing" describe a basic distinction in symptomatology that is extensively validated (23), these two types of symptoms often co-occur in adolescence.
Should the court agree that those overall limits are unconstitutional, however, its decision could represent a fundamental reassessment of a basic distinction established in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976, which said contributions may be regulated more strictly than expenditures because of their potential for corruption.
Should the court agree that some overall limits are unconstitutional, the decision could represent a reassessment of a basic distinction established in a 1976 decision, Buckley v. Valeo, which said contributions may be regulated more strictly than expenditures because of their potential for corruption.
