Sentence examples for a basic disagreement from inspiring English sources
The phrase "a basic disagreement" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used to describe a fundamental difference in opinion or perspective between individuals or groups. Example: "The two parties had a basic disagreement on the approach to the project, which led to a stalemate in negotiations."
"There is a basic disagreement between the Bloomberg administration and the superior officers of the F.D.N.Y.," Captain Gorman said.
"I have a basic disagreement," he told me, "with the underlying rationale that began in the Clinton Administration about the concentration of economic wealth".
At the heart of the battle is a basic disagreement over when life begins, and how to balance a woman's rights against the potential rights of the fetus.
But since the matter represents at its root a basic disagreement between Democrats and Republicans, several conflict-resolution experts found through an on-line Locate-a-Mediator service were sought out for reassurance.
Stalling progress is a basic disagreement between nations that want to see more power vested in the office of the secretary general and the 15-member Security Council and others, from the developing world, who want to retain power in the 191-member General Assembly.
In particular, a basic disagreement smoldered over whether the engine box should be respected as a dining table, most particularly at mealtime, when it certainly ought not to be opened and we would have to deposit the oily bilge pump onto a freshly washed tablecloth.
You can't call it a debate, because there's no basic disagreement.
This basic disagreement has to a certain extent paralyzed the negotiations, where each side insists on maintaining their positions.
But if the two sides are in basic disagreement, that could result in a loss of operational coordination on the dollar since the Fed and the Treasury must both be intimately involved in any decision to sell or buy dollars in the currency markets.
Beyond this basic disagreement, one reader from Washington, D.C., proposes a novel way to raise revenue for job benefits "tax newspaper editorials".
Although this was his basic disagreement with Auriol, Gregory was so careful a philosopher that before he refuted Auriol on this point he corrected his Franciscan predecessor on details and in so doing made Auriol's own theory more precise.
