Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(20)
A back analysis on a failed slope was performed.
The best-fit results of a back analysis for the first rock avalanche not using the flexible block model are shown in Fig. 11b.
A back analysis was carried out using the above-described "GeoFlow_SPH" model in order to estimate the initial volume (Vin) of the landslide and the main mechanical properties.
To model the landslide and obtain its rheological parameters, a back analysis of the event was performed by means of a depth-averaged 3D numerical code called DAN3D.
For the determination of the rheological model parameters, a back analysis was performed based on the study of the deposits from the March 2015 collapse.
Therefore, the best rheological model is determined by performing a back analysis for to the investigated case by using similar phenomena.
Similar(40)
The advantages of the proposed framework are then exhibited through a back-analysis that focuses to the recent period.
Based on field observations regarding initial landslide volume and final deposition volume, height, and length, the mechanical properties of the landslide were estimated in a back-analysis.
A back-analysis of the West Salt Creek Rock Avalanche was conducted based on the failure mechanism described by Coe et al. (2016).
It is shown that the proposed analytical solution can be effectively used as a "back-analysis" tool for the characterization of rock elasticity and strength properties.
These models work well in a back-analysis context; however, they have only been applied to forecast potential runout in a few published cases (e.g. Nicol et al. 2013; Loew et al. 2017).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com