Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a avg" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to say "an average," which is the correct form.
Example: "The average score of the class was 85%."
Alternatives: "an average" or "a mean value."
Exact(5)
A difference of 100 points indicates that the probability of winning a AVG match for the stronger player is 64%, 200 points is 76%.
The envelope attenuation factor ξ is defined by ξ = A avg, A avg < A D A D, A avg ≥ A D, (17).
The quantity A avg represents the average insert activity concentration assessed from image-based evaluations.
The mean values a avg = 2.7, 2.3 and b avg = 0.059 and 0.062 are very close to the means obtained from duplicate hybridization assays, although in this case the means also include comparisons across biological replicate cultures.
For the glucose oxidase treated versus untreated comparisons, we observe that the average constant component a avg = 2.4, is quite similar to values observed for other lymphoblast culture replicates but the proportionality coefficient bincreases about 2-fold to 0.120 (Table 2; for the complete data see Additional file 7: Supplemental Table S1 and Additional file 8: Supplemental Table S2).
Similar(55)
Two hundred and eleven out of 246 patients (86%) received an AVF, 16 (6%) an AVG and 19 (8%) a permanent catheter (PC) as the first permanent access.
One patient for whom modifier codes indicated both a catheter and an AVG on the first outpatient dialysis claim was included in the catheter category.
While a φ 0.90 mm DE droplet flows in an avg.
If an AVG is used, one allowing early cannulation may prevent the requirement for a central venous dialysis catheter.
Cheap clothes are made by underage workers entering the industry as young as 14 to work long hard hours (an avg. of 14 hrs per day in sweatshops) for low wages, while dealing with sexual harassment.
Use of an AVG (compared with AVF), use of epoetin alpha, and higher serum creatinine were associated with greater variability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com