Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a army of" is not correct in written English; it should be "an army of." You can use it when referring to a large group of soldiers or metaphorically to describe a large number of people or things working together.
Example: "The project was supported by an army of volunteers who dedicated their time to help the community."
Alternatives: "a legion of" or "a multitude of."
Exact(2)
He refers to "some of the things we've introduced" to get young people involved but does not seem to have the same passion as Cameron about the Tory leader's vision of a army of volunteers, part of his "big society" scheme.
Ultimately Personal Audio came to the realization that taking a high profile podcaster to court - one with a army of fans ready to crowdfund his legal expenses no less - was a bad idea and they've since moved onto more lucrative prey in Internet TV broadcasters.
Similar(58)
This was an army of occupation a hundred thousand strong.
Watching an army of computer generated aliens fight an army of computer generated robots is boring after five minutes.
Were they an army of imperial conquest?
An army of Davids beats an army of Goliaths.
Clinton has an army of defenders.
But an army of scientists was involved.
Trying raising an army of Kickboxers.
They're an army of occupation.
It would require an army of volunteers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com