Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(56)
Has anyone you've worked with read your blog?
"My [staff] read The Economist, and the people they trade with read it too.
However, read endurance is failed with read voltages of −1.5, −2, and −4 V.
Robust read pulse endurances of >106 cycles are observed with read voltages of −1, 1, and 4 V.
MG1655 when simulating 454 sequencing technology with read length 100 bp and 250 bp and Sanger sequencing with read length of 800 bp, respectively.
Consequently, our results can be extended to sequencing with read pairing.
Only unique sequences with read count greater than 2 were included for subsequent annotation and analysis.
Similar(4)
* Fixes issues with read-only calendars.
File with read-across results for acute toxicity validation set.
File with read-across results for bio-concentration factor external set.
A common aim of these case studies was to examine sources of uncertainty associated with read-across.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com