We can hear

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "We can hear" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the ability to perceive sound or when discussing auditory experiences. Example: "We can hear the birds singing outside our window every morning."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"We can hear them screaming.

Independent

We can hear you".

The Guardian - Arts

"We can hear you," Mr Bush replied.

The Economist

We can hear the angels sing.

The New York Times

"We can hear them all land, though".

The New York Times

We can hear the lawsuits knockin'.

The New York Times

We can hear thunder and rain outside.

The New Yorker

"We can hear one of them".

Independent

"H1 to H3, we can hear him".

The New Yorker

We can hear it roar.

The Guardian - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

We can hear him.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "We can hear", clarify if the ability to hear is general or specific to a situation. For example, differentiate between "We can hear well" (general ability) and "We can hear the music" (specific instance).

Common error

Avoid using "We can hear" when the intention is to understand information. Use "We can understand" instead. For example, instead of "We can hear what you mean", say "We can understand what you mean".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "We can hear" primarily functions as a declarative statement expressing the ability to perceive sounds. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. The examples provided show its use in various contexts to indicate auditory perception.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "We can hear" is a versatile phrase used to express the ability to perceive sounds across various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage. Predominantly found in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Science domains, this phrase serves to convey sensory experiences, confirm auditory reception, and describe acoustic environments. For alternatives, consider "we are able to hear" or other contextually relevant substitutes. Remember to use "We can understand" when referring to comprehension, and ensure clarity by specifying what is being heard.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

We are able to hear

Emphasizes ability using a more formal tone.

We have the ability to hear

Highlights the capability to hear, adding emphasis.

Sound is audible to us

Shifts the focus to the audibility of the sound rather than the act of hearing.

We perceive the sound of

A more descriptive and sensory way to express hearing.

We pick up the sound of

Implies detecting a sound, often subtle.

We are picking up audio signals

Technical context, focuses on audio signals.

Audio reaches our ears

Focuses on how audio is detected passively.

Sound is coming through

Highlights transmission of sound.

We are receiving audio

Formal and neutral to state receiving audio.

Audio is being received by us

Passive, emphasizes the reception of sound.

FAQs

What does "We can hear" mean?

"We can hear" means that we have the ability to perceive sounds. It indicates that our auditory senses are functioning and capable of receiving and processing sound waves.

How can I use "We can hear" in a sentence?

You can use "We can hear" in various contexts. For example, "We can hear the birds singing" indicates you are perceiving the sound of birds. Another example could be, "We can hear you clearly", stating that the audio is understandable.

What are some alternatives to "We can hear"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "We are able to hear", "We can listen to", or "We perceive". Each alternative can convey a slightly different nuance.

Is it correct to say "We can hear to"?

No, it is not grammatically correct to say "We can hear to". The correct usage is "We can hear" followed by the object or sound being heard. For example, "We can hear the music", not "We can hear to the music".