Sentence examples for Void a contract from inspiring English sources
The phrase "void a contract" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English
It means to cancel or invalidate a contract. Example: The court ruled that the contract was void due to one party's misrepresentation of important information.
Fraud can be a criminal action, and it can also void a contract.
The morals clause stipulates that a team can void a contract if the player fails, refuses or neglects to "conform his personal conduct to standards of good citizenship, good moral character (defined here to mean not engaging in acts of moral turpitude, whether or not such acts would constitute a crime), and good sportsmanship".
In 2006, the Court of Appeals rejected former Comptroller William C. Thompson Jr.'s effort to void a contract on Snapple, writing that "the Charter establishes in plain language that the mayor and the corporation counsel — not the comptroller — bear the burden of determining that procedural requirements have been met and legal authority exists to award a concession contract".
In 2007, shortly after opening the first Moeder Lambic bar south of Brussels in the St. Gilles region, Mr. Hummler and his partner, Nassim Dessicy, fought the brewing giant Duvel to void a contract signed by the previous owners stipulating that his taps include several offerings from the mega-brewer.
You may be able to void a contract because of fraud.
There is precedent for voiding a contract because of a player's off-field activity.
A judge recently voided a contract between Trump Entertainment and its 1,100 unionised employees at the casino, essentially nixing their healthcare and pension benefits.
He voided a contract that had given Silverberg and his brother, Joseph, exclusive rights to use the Jordan name on a restaurant in the six-county Chicago area.
The commissioner's office had voided a contract he signed last month because the deal was reached after a Dec. 7 deadline for Sanders to re-sign with Cincinnati.
Contractual restrictions on consumer reviews are probably already void as demonstrated in a New York ruling from 2003 (People v. Network Associates) that voided a contract that restricted product reviews.
The 5-2 voidsvoids a contract the city signed in 2013 that pays the Coyotes $225 million in public money over 15 years to manage the city-owned Gila River Arena.
