Validated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Validated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been confirmed or approved by a specific person or organization. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated by an independent research team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She felt somewhat validated by it".

The New Yorker

This attitude was validated by tax data.

The New York Times

"It can't be validated by other people.

The New York Times

Historical fact is never validated by opinion; it can only be validated by evidence".

The Guardian - Music

Genes identified were validated by knockdown studies.

Harvard University

Its degrees are validated by City University London.

The Guardian

"I was very much validated by the players.

The Guardian - Sport

On occasion, his instincts were validated by an arrest.

The New York Times

The decision was validated by the Australian supreme court.

The Guardian - Opinion

Undergraduate degree programmes are validated by the University of Sussex.

The Guardian

But now they have been validated by his own board.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validated by", ensure the source of validation is credible and clearly identified to strengthen the claim.

Common error

Avoid blindly accepting information just because it's "validated by" a source. Always critically assess the source's credibility, methodology, and potential biases before accepting the validation as definitive proof.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validated by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been confirmed or verified by a specific entity or process. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage, showing its function in different contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "validated by" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something has been confirmed or verified by a particular source or method. Ludwig AI's analysis of numerous examples reveals that it is most frequently used in scientific, academic, and news contexts to lend credibility to claims and findings. While alternatives such as "confirmed by" or "supported by" exist, "validated by" often suggests a more rigorous or formal verification process. When using this phrase, it is important to cite credible sources and critically assess the information to avoid over-reliance on validation without proper context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Supported by

Indicates that something is backed or corroborated by evidence or findings.

Demonstrated by

Emphasizes that something is shown or made evident through a particular action or result.

Corroborated by

Stresses the strengthening of evidence or findings through additional sources.

Verified by

Emphasizes the act of checking and ensuring the accuracy or truth of something.

Substantiated by

Focuses on providing evidence to prove the truth or validity of something.

Confirmed through

Focuses on the process of confirmation using a specific method or source.

Proven by

Indicates that something has been demonstrated to be true through evidence or testing.

Authenticated by

Highlights the establishment of genuineness or validity through formal means.

Endorsed by

Implies approval and support from an authoritative figure or organization.

Ratified by

Implies formal approval or sanctioning, often by a governing body.

FAQs

How can I use "validated by" in a sentence?

Use "validated by" to indicate that a claim, result, or method has been confirmed or supported by a reliable source or process. For example, "The research findings were validated by an independent study".

What are some alternatives to "validated by"?

You can use alternatives such as "confirmed by", "supported by", or "verified by" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "validated by" or "confirmed by"?

Both "validated by" and "confirmed by" are acceptable, but "validated by" often implies a more rigorous or formal process of verification, particularly in scientific or technical contexts. Choose the one that best fits the specific situation.

What does it mean for a study to be "validated by" other researchers?

When a study is "validated by" other researchers, it means that its findings have been replicated or supported by subsequent studies conducted by independent teams. This increases the confidence in the original study's conclusions.