Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
Two years following
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "Two years following" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a time period that occurs two years after a specific event or point in time. Example: "Two years following the launch of the new product, sales began to increase significantly."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Two years following construction, a track was added and track schedules were transferred there from nearby Kincaid Field.
Wiki
Two years following diagnosis of CNS metastases, 70.3% of patients had died.
Science
Two years following the introduction of computerised HCs, clinic staff were asked for feedback regarding the content of computerised HCs.
Fifty-five of the 67 patients had a minimum follow-up of two years following RTSA.
This increase is substantially more pronounced the first two years following VC investments, i.e., patent trajectories follow an inverted U-shape over time.
Science
All of the participants were followed for two years: either for the two years following the beginning of the global program for those in the intervention group, or for the two years following randomization for those in the control group.
The term of office will be two years following selection.
Employment actually dropped over the two years following that cut.
News & Media
Forcing compressed the period of most productive fruiting to the two years following spawn run.
Science
McNulty studied 72 newlywed couples over two years, following up with them every six months.
Tree trunks, twigs, leaves and roots were sampled periodically for two years following injection.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "Two years following", ensure the context clearly establishes the initial event or date. This provides a clear reference point for the subsequent two-year period.
Common error
Avoid ambiguity by explicitly stating the event that "Two years following" refers to. For example, instead of writing 'Improvements were noted two years following', specify 'Improvements were noted two years following the implementation of the new policy'.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "Two years following" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, indicating a time frame relative to a specific event. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in defining a duration after an occurrence.
Frequent in
Science
38%
News & Media
30%
Academia
14%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Wiki
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "Two years following" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase that specifies a two-year period after a defined event. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and broad applicability. It's most commonly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts to establish a temporal relationship. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the event it references to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "Two years afterward" or "In the two years after" offer similar meanings with slight variations in formality. Overall, the phrase is a versatile tool for describing timeframes in various forms of writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Two years afterward
Emphasizes the sequence of events with a straightforward temporal marker.
In the two years after
Specifies the duration more explicitly with "in".
Two years subsequently
Implies a formal and direct chronological succession.
Two years thereafter
Indicates a more formal and literary continuation in time.
Two years from then on
Highlights a point in the past and the subsequent two-year duration.
Two years elapsed since
Emphasizes the passage of time, indicating that two years have passed since a particular event.
Twenty-four months later
Uses a different unit of time to specify the same duration.
A couple of years after
Less formal, indicating an approximate duration of two years.
Two years hence
A more archaic phrasing indicating a point two years in the future from a reference point, here used in the past.
Two years down the line
Informal expression referring to a period of two years in the future from a past event.
FAQs
How can I use "Two years following" in a sentence?
Use "Two years following" to indicate a period of two years after a specific event. For example, "Two years following the surgery, the patient made a full recovery."
What can I say instead of "Two years following"?
You can use alternatives like "two years afterward", "two years subsequently", or "in the two years after" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "Two years following" or "For two years following"?
"Two years following" is generally preferred when the beginning of the period is clear. "For two years following" can be used to emphasize duration or when further clarification is needed.
What's the difference between "Two years following" and "After two years"?
"Two years following" emphasizes the starting point (the event) and the period after it, while "After two years" focuses on the duration that has passed. For example, "Two years following the launch, sales increased" versus "After two years, sales increased".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested