Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Although the majority of the reviews reported a two reviewer selection and data abstraction processes, only 35(5%) reported agreement levels among the reviewers.
There are more positive recommendations by Re than by Ra for only 11% of the manuscripts (there is no difference between the recommendations by the two reviewer groups for 67% of the manuscripts).
The two reviewer teams completely agreed (κ = 1) on the selection of included studies.
If the two reviewer scores for a video did not fall within the same RTOP category or lay at opposite ends of a single category (Table 1), then additional reviews were conducted by new reviewers until a majority of reviews yielded similar scores (< 8 points apart within one category).
Our strengths have included using a two reviewer system and a dual extraction process of both numerically coded data and free text summaries of papers, which enabled us to analyse identified instruments in-depth and an extensive exploration of grey literature with a world-wide perspective.
Similar(55)
Two reviewers reviewed the abstracts independently.
Two reviewers independently reviewed each publication.
Two reviewers independently assessed studies.
Two reviewers screened abstracts and full texts.
Two reviewers independently assessed interventional studies for potential inclusion.
Two reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com