Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
In this regard, very little differences were noted at the higher FTE efficiency range (i.e., larger values of M and N). Figure 13 Productivity difference map between two FTE efficiency simulations that systematically varied M and N for 18 chemists and 18 biologists (1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority lead optimization projects).
Overall medical care cost consisted of one physician (one full time equivalent/FTE), two interns (two FTE), and two consultants (0.45 and 0.05 FTE).
A random sample of 36 family medicine practices, stratified by size (small: up to two full-time equivalent (FTE) working family physicians on the same location, large: more than two FTE family physicians) and location (urban: more than 30,000 habitants, rural: 30,000 habitants or less) were included in the study.
Similar(57)
"It eliminates the need for two FTEs, so my staff can focus on other key priorities.
Assuming the effective operation of levels 1 and 2, level 3 requires two FTEs, or 4 5 specialists committing 40-50% of their time to headache.
In fact, two people can constitute one FTE if they both make up one salary.
For example, if an intervention (e.g., decolonization, screening, hiring of one FTE) costs less than $61,000 and leads to the prevention of only one SSI due to MRSA, then this intervention will likely be cost effective for the institution.
For example participants who worked in a location with more than ten FTE physiotherapists stated: " I suppose regional, yes.
Ranking of PR-A PR-B ratio data by quartiles revealed an overall difference in distribution among the four FTE grouPR-A PR-B06).
[D1] One participant who worked in an area with between four to ten FTE physiotherapists stated that their perception of rurality was to some degree based on patient location.
Such automation can empower one FTE (Full Time Equivalent) to do as much as five FTEs once deployed at scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com