Traditional logic synthesis methodologies are driven by timing, area or power consumption constraints.
"Traditional logic is incomplete as a tool of rationality," Toulmin wrote, and urged a "respect for contingency", which has its own (non-logical) necessity.
Traditional logic begins with concepts or ideas, moves on to judgments and ends with reasoning (syllogisms, arguments).
Traditional logic studied certain simple relationships between classes, namely being a subclass of and having a nonempty intersection with.
Traditional logic suggests that two presentations must be involved in every judgement, since a judgement is made when something is attributed or denied of something else.
Traditional logic would dictate that we ignore these people, that we don't "feed the trolls".
Aside from Herbart's textbook presentation of traditional logic (e.g., Section II of LEP), his main logical innovation is his so-called method of relations, devised as an organon for correct metaphysical thinking (SW V: 201, f).
When he performs, he upends the traditional logic of touring.
Enthymeme, in syllogistic, or traditional, logic, name of a syllogistic argument that is incompletely stated.
Deduction is the sort of rationality that is the central concern of traditional logic.
In most other respects, Shegelski told me, curling defies traditional logic.
